Jane Austen, renowned for her sharp insights into 19th-century English culture, was an avid letter writer during her lifetime. Yet, merely around 160 of her letters remain today. This scarcity is mostly attributed to her older sister, Cassandra Austen, who burned a large number of their letters following Jane’s passing. This decision has captivated both scholars and enthusiasts, sparking debates about Cassandra’s reasons and the knowledge that may have vanished with those letters.
The Strong Connection Between Sisters
Cassandra Austen, born in 1773, was older than Jane by two years. The two shared a remarkably close bond, frequently characterized by deep mutual love and comprehension. As the sole daughters in a family of eight children, they shared much of their lives, offering each other support in both personal matters and professional pursuits. The letters that survive between them illustrate a profound closeness, rich with personal stories, literary discussions, and musings on everyday happenings.
Cassandra’s Choice to Burn the Letters
In the years after Jane passed away in 1817, Cassandra assumed the responsibility of examining their vast collection of letters. She meticulously burned many of them and altered others, cutting out parts she considered sensitive. This intentional editing has sparked discussion among historians. While some see it as an act of literary destruction, denying future generations important glimpses into Jane’s private life and creative journey, others see it as a protective measure meant to guard her sister’s privacy and protect family members from possible negative depictions.
Potential Reasons for the Destruction
Se han sugerido varias teorías para explicar las acciones de Cassandra:
- Salvaguardar la Reputación de Jane: En el siglo XIX, las normas sociales valoraban enormemente la privacidad personal y la decencia. Las cartas de Jane, conocidas por su franqueza y ocasional agudo ingenio, podían haber incluido comentarios que se interpretaran mal o se consideraran inapropiados. Al destruirlas, Cassandra pudo haber intentado conservar la imagen de su hermana como una mujer respetable y refinada.
- Proteger la Privacidad Familiar: La familia Austen, como cualquier otra, tenía sus asuntos personales y dinámicas internas. Las cartas probablemente contenían referencias a problemas familiares, opiniones sobre conocidos y otros detalles íntimos. Cassandra podría haber querido evitar cualquier posible vergüenza o malentendido que pudiera surgir del escrutinio público.
- Duelo Personal y Catarsis: La pérdida de Jane fue un golpe significativo para Cassandra. La acción de destruir las cartas pudo haber sido una manera de procesar su dolor, permitiéndole dejar atrás el pasado y encontrar consuelo.
Influencia en la Investigación Literaria
La eliminación de estas cartas ha dejado, sin duda, vacíos en el registro histórico. Biógrafos y estudiosos de la literatura a menudo han lamentado esta pérdida, especulando sobre las posibles revelaciones sobre el desarrollo de los personajes de Jane Austen, sus fuentes de inspiración y sus relaciones personales que se desvanecieron para siempre. Las cartas que aún existen brindan vislumbres invaluables de su mundo, pero la amplitud completa de sus pensamientos y experiencias sigue siendo desconocida.
Reconsiderando el Legado de Cassandra
Reevaluating Cassandra’s Legacy
In recent years, there has been a shift towards a more empathetic understanding of Cassandra’s actions. Rather than viewing her solely as the executor of a significant literary loss, some scholars and writers have portrayed her as a devoted sister who played a crucial role in Jane’s life and legacy. For instance, contemporary novelist Gill Hornby explored Cassandra’s perspective in her work, shedding light on the complexities of her character and the possible reasons behind her decisions.
